The Wildlife Professional is an exclusive benefit of membership in The Wildlife Society. Published six times annually, the magazine presents timely research news and analysis of trends in the wildlife profession.
Don’t miss another issue! Join today to start receiving The Wildlife Professional in your mailbox and all the other great benefits of TWS membership.
Deserts may seem barren but they host a number of species that are often highly specialized to their conditions. However, as these conditions change due to a warming climate and urbanization, wildlife professionals are grappling with conserving many wildlife species. In the Jan/Feb issue of The Wildlife Professional, we explore how some species are adapting to changes while others are facing more challenges in the unique deserts of the southwestern U.S.
Our special focus for this issue focuses on water conservation and conservation of wildlife associated with water.
Watch for the issue in your mailbox, or log in and check it out online.
Only one paper made both top 10 lists—singing silver-haired bats (Lasionycteris noctivagans), Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2023. This might seem unusual, but it’s not entirely unexpected. The objectives and timeframes of media and scientists are quite distinct. As scientists, our primary aim is to advance knowledge through rigorous and objective research. Such an approach does not always align with the rapid pace of news cycles or the need for attention-grabbing headlines. As a result, one would expect to see some difference between how the media and scientists use our journal content.
However, that difference isn’t necessarily a good thing. While we’re excited to see the use of our journals expand by both the media and the scientific community, we also want to make sure that the most important topics to wildlife professionals are communicated effectively to the public. Organizations like TWS play a role in helping bridge communication between scientists and the public by ensuring that the most relevant and accurate information is communicated in a compelling and engaging manner.
As we kick off 2025, you will continue to see TWS work to expand media coverage of science published in TWS journals, but you will also see several new communication initiatives being led by TWS staff. Embedded within TWS’ new strategic plan is a focus on expanding our web presence to ensure greater dissemination of scientific information to the general public. This will include developing a more engaging website, expanding the use of social media, exploring the use of video content and trying out new methods of communication for TWS, like podcasts, in an effort to reach a broader audience.
Whether through external media or through our own award-winning communications team, TWS is making sure that the science of wildlife professionals makes it to your peers, the general public and beyond. Thank you to all of the authors and readers of this year’s top 10 list!
Are you publishing your science in a Society-owned journal? For many nonprofit, professional societies like TWS, publications are crucial to the mission and operations of the organization. By publishing in a Society-owned journal you are not only contributing to the advancement of science but also supporting the organizations that help advocate for science, provide resources to professionals, uphold professional ethics, build stronger communities, and recruit the next generation of professionals.
On Dec. 18, the U.S. Senate voted to pass the America’s Conservation Enhancement Restoration (ACE) Act (S. 3791, H.R. 8811), a law that would reauthorize several key conservation programs through 2030.
This is the final step for the bill in Congress before it makes its way to President Biden to be signed into law.
In early 2024, the Senate first approved the bill, which received bipartisan support. The U.S. House of Representatives passed the bill with amendments earlier in December. The ACE Act reauthorizes funding for the North American Wetlands Conservation Act, the Chronic Wasting Disease Task Force, the Chesapeake Bay Program and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
The ACE Act also grants statutory authority to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to implement a black vulture (Coragyps atratus) livestock protection program and conduct research on levels of take currently occurring in black vulture populations. As the range of black vultures has expanded in recent years, landowners have reported higher instances of conflict between the species and livestock. There has also been an increased demand for lethal take of the species. The program authorization included in the ACE Act expands upon a USFWS pilot program to improve permitting for black vulture take under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
As we near the end of 2024, other significant packages of bipartisan conservation legislation are still moving through Congress. The Wildlife Innovation and Longevity Driver (WILD) Act (S. 2395, H.R. 5009) is expected to go to the president’s desk shortly. The bill reauthorizes funding for the USFWS Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program, as well as several species-specific conservation programs for African and Asian elephants, marine turtles, great apes and others.
To conserve Andean bears in Peru, the best strategy may be to conserve high-altitude grasslands bordering cloud forests. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) lists Andean bears (Tremarctos ornatus) as vulnerable due to habitat loss, climate change and human conflict. Scientists knew that the bears eat flowering plants called bromeliads, but they didn’t know much about the bears’ foraging behavior and plant preferences. In a study published in PLOS ONE, researchers used trail cameras to answer some of these questions. They found that Andean bears foraged in only 16.7% of available bromeliad patches where they felt safe from human disturbance. The areas they chose were also places where livestock had grazed only a few decades prior. The researchers determined that conservation managers should focus on conserving high-altitude grasslands bordering cloud forests and should consider how livestock have used the area.
The Wildlife Society, through its continued partnership with the U.S. Forest Service, is excited to announce the availability of research assistantships for Native undergraduate or graduate students in the summer of 2025 as part of the Native American Research Assistantship (NARA) Program. Applications are being accepted now through Jan. 20, 2025. Visit this link for additional information and instructions on how to apply.
Established in 2014, NARA provides training for careers in natural resource and conservation-related fields, promotes Native student advancement in the wildlife profession and elevates Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge (ITEK) within federal research projects.
Hunter Grove, a 2024 program participant studying at Oregon State University, is enrolled in the Karuk Tribe and focused a NARA project on examining methods for detecting pregnancy in free-living mesocarnivores like wolverines (Gulo gulo) and Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis).
“I was able to enhance my professional path in many different ways thanks to the various opportunities I took advantage of while in the program,” Grove said of the program. “This includes meeting with Native grad students, helping with different projects and discussions with others.”
Applicants selected for NARA will engage with representatives from TWS while learning from and working with an interdisciplinary team of USFS Research and Development on a three-month research project. This year, we are seeking Native students for four projects during the summer of 2025. Each assistantship will include a paid stipend of at least $6,500.
Another 2024 participant, Nadira Mitchell, enrolled in the Navajo Nation and studying at the University of Arizona, worked alongside Serra Hoagland from the USFS to develop sections of a comprehensive Tribal Wildlife Management Plan that the Mescalero Apache Tribe requested.
“During my research assistantship, I was able to gain a real life experience in what it means to have a career in natural resources and wildlife management,” Mitchell said. “I was able to do fieldwork, remote sensing research, and also attend meetings with tribal leadership and leadership within the USDA Forest Service.”
For detailed information on the available opportunities in 2025 and instructions on how to apply, please visit the Native American Research Assistantship Program website.
Common murre colony numbers halved in the Gulf of Alaska following a marine heat wave. Scientists and other observers first discovered a massive mortality event in the seabirds in 2020 along the West Coast of the U.S. and Alaska. The University of Washington Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team (COASST) discovered 62,000 carcasses in just one year. They believed a massive marine heat wave from 2014 to 2016 known as “the blob” caused the decline. In a study recently published in Science, researchers set out to estimate the total mortality of common murres (Uria aalge) and later effects from the heat wave. After analyzing 13 colonies surveyed between 2008 and 2022, they found that the colony size in the Gulf of Alaska halved after the heat wave. Colonies along the eastern Bering Sea declined 75%. “This study shows clear and surprisingly long-lasting impacts of a marine heat wave on a top marine predator species,” said Julia Parrish, a professor at the University of Washington and co-author of the study. “Importantly, the effect of the heat wave wasn’t via thermal stress on the birds, but rather shifts in the food web leaving murres suddenly and fatally without enough food.”
The New York Times recently covered a study published in The Journal of Wildlife Management titled, “Rehabilitating tigers for range expansion: lessons from the Russian Far East.”
If you haven’t read The New York Timesarticle yet, I encourage you to do so. The author delivers a feel-good story ripe for the holiday season. Underlying the “unlikely love story” and fairy tale prince, though, is a novel success in big cat reintroductions with wide-ranging conservation implications. You can read the full study here. Members of The Wildlife Society receive free access to all papers published in The Journal of Wildlife Management.
After reading The New York Times article, our journal team started wondering about other studies featured in the news. With a little help from our friends at Wiley and the magic of Altmetric® data, we can look back at the influence of TWS journals in 2024.
So far this year, studies published in TWS journals have been mentioned 455 times in news articles covering 108 days, 46 weeks and all 12 months of the year. In 2024, there was a good chance you saw our science in the news. So which papers received the most media attention? Let’s take a look.
Top 10 mentioned papers from TWS journals in news outlets:
Media coverage plays a crucial role in disseminating scientific knowledge to the general public. While TWS journals help further our scientific understanding of wildlife management along sound biological lines, articles like the one published by The New York Times help transform a complex topic into something accessible for the masses—a relatable story. This fosters greater awareness of current wildlife issues, highlights the importance of wildlife professionals, builds public trust in scientists and the scientific process, and hopefully inspires members of the next generation to pursue a career in wildlife science.
It should come as no surprise that TWS values media coverage that builds a more informed and engaged public. In fact, earlier this year, TWS Council approved a new strategic plan that prioritizes TWS’ external influence with goals like, “increase public engagement and interest in wildlife by expanding TWS’ communications and member exposure,” and “support and coordinate with organizations focused on increasing public engagement and interest in wildlife through communications and education.” As we enter 2025, we hope to build upon the success of this year and bring even more attention to our members and the science being published in our journals.
Our Altmetric® assessment also reveals a wealth of other equally exciting data. In 2024, TWS journals were cited in at least 159 government reports, management recommendations and plans and other policy documents in five different countries. This includes publications from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, the USDA Forest Service, the Scottish Government, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the Publications Office of the European Union, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the California Fire Science Consortium.
Finally, while our journals didn’t quite hit trending status on social media, like this TWS post on Instagram, we did see some traction. In 2024, TWS journals were mentioned in over 1,655 posts on the social media platform X. This includes 749 X mentions for the paper, Insect pollinators: The time is now for identifying species of greatest conservation need, published in the Wildlife Society Bulletin, in July 2024.
Thank you to all of the authors, reviewers, editors, field crews and others who contributed to the advancement of wildlife science this year. The Wildlife Society would not exist without your efforts. Wishing you all a happy new year!
Are you publishing your science in a Society-owned journal? For many nonprofit, professional societies like TWS, publications are crucial to the mission and operations of the organization. By publishing in a Society-owned journal you are not only contributing to the advancement of science but also supporting the organizations that help advocate for science, provide resources to professionals, uphold professional ethics, build stronger communities, and recruit the next generation of professionals.
As droughts become more frequent and more prolonged throughout the United States, it may become more difficult for many species to adapt to the changing conditions. Species that already inhabit dry climates, like the endangered giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens), may face plummeting populations due to compounding threats, including extensive loss of habitat. “The degree of increased drought exposure for each species in our analysis strongly depends on future greenhouse gas concentrations,” said Merijn van den Bosch, the lead author of the study. “But even under a lower-concentration scenario, virtually all vertebrates face increased year-long and multi-year droughts in the second half of this century. The implications will depend on the species and the length of the drought.”
The first sign that Thomas Gable and his colleagues were approaching a kill site was the calls of crows and eagles cutting through the winter silence in northern Minnesota.
The ecologist in the Voyageurs Wolf Project at the University of Minnesota was surveying wolf predation last winter when snowfall was particularly low. He and his colleagues had GPS collars on wolves in two packs near Voyageurs National Park. When data were relayed back to Gable and his team’s computer, they looked for the telltale cluster of location points that indicated a potential kill.
Many of these were areas where the wolves just slept, while others were kill sites. But if they didn’t get to the area quick enough—especially in the spring or fall—it was sometimes hard to detect, as the wolves often left few traces of their meals behind. “If you didn’t know a kill was there, you could miss it if you walked by,” Gable said, adding that the blood was mostly gone after a few days in some cases.
In other cases, there was still plenty of carnage—blood on the white snow, chunks of hair and leftover stomach contents of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Scavengers like bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) were still around picking at the remains.
The trouble was that the snow that made the detection of blood easier wasn’t often there. The winter of 2023-2024 saw some of the lowest snowfall in years. In fact, while temperatures are warming in this area due to climate change, the snowfall has increased in the past decade. Gable and his team already knew what wolf predation was like in the spring, summer and fall. But they wanted to get an idea of wolf (Canis lupus) predation in the winter. They assumed the weather would be typical for the season.
“We didn’t plan on last year being the mildest winter on record,” he said. “So, in some aspects, this study kind of fell into our lap.”
The data has so far revealed that a lack of winter snow may be putting wolves on leaner diets as deer become harder to capture. Gable and his colleagues detailed these findings in a study published recently in Ecology and Evolution.
“Wolves were really struggling to get a sufficient amount of food in that winter,” he said.
Starting in September 2023, the team collared one wolf in each pack with GPS devices. In the fall, they studied the predation behavior of wolves in six packs. They continued to study the predation behavior of two of those packs in the winter, and in spring they studied the predation behavior of wolves in five packs.
They also employed trail cameras to determine pack sizes.
Throughout this period, the team visited each presumed kill site based on the clusters of GPS locations. At the end of the study, they estimated how many deer each pack killed. They then divided this number by the number of wolves in the pack to determine how much food each wolf was getting.
Other research has revealed how many deer wolves kill in a typical year, as well as how much food a wolf needs each day to maintain its body weight. This is typically about 2.3 kilograms per day for the average wolf in the Voyageurs area, which are smaller than wolves in Yellowstone or in western Canada.
During this low-snow winter, the team estimated that each wolf in the packs they tracked only received about 2.1 kilograms per day, assuming no loss to scavengers like ravens (Corvus corax) and eagles. But in reality, scavengers likely consumed 10-20% of kills, meaning each wolf likely only received about 1.8-1.9 kilograms per day.
This drop in sustenance is particularly significant because the winter is usually an easier time for wolves in Minnesota. In the summer, it’s often harder for wolves to hunt deer, which are in better condition to escape predators due to abundant forage and lack of snow. They may eat a lot of fawns in June, but these animals are so small that wolves usually just squeak by in this period, Gable said. Plus, wolves also have cubs to feed at this time, which require additional food.
In the winter, heavy snowfall makes it difficult for deer to move, and the leafy vegetation that deer like to eat is absent. This makes them easier prey since there are weaker adult deer around. If heavy snow continues into spring, or there is a lot of late snow, these conditions can persist.
But last winter, low snowfall meant the deer could move around more easily and access forage through the colder months. “Mild winters are going to result in reduced predation success,” Gable said. “Most wolves were probably losing body weight throughout the majority of the winter.”
Luckily for the wolves of the Greater Voyageurs Ecosystem, last winter’s lack of snow was an anomaly. But if conditions change as the climate continues to warm over the decades, it could affect the way that wolves operate in this area. If milder winters make deer more difficult to catch, for example, the packs might be forced to expand their territory to find enough vulnerable deer.
This photo essay is part of an occasional series from The Wildlife Society featuring photos and video images of wildlife taken with camera traps and other equipment. Check out other entries in the series here. If you’re working on an interesting camera trap research project or one that has a series of good photos you’d like to share, email Josh at jlearn@wildlife.org.
A whiskered tern (Chlidonias hybrid) crash landing, a red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) stuck in a tree and a dancing insect are some of the highlights of Nikon’s 2024 Comedy Wildlife Awards. Each year, the competition receives thousands of images from around the world in an effort to not only make people laugh, but to help the public better understand wildlife and the importance of conservation. “Our world is extraordinarily beautiful and interconnected, yet the human race is doing its best to over-exploit and damage it. Issues of wildlife conservation and sustainability are gaining momentum globally, yet the messages and images tend to be negative, depressing and enervating,” said Comedy Wildlife co-founder Paul Joynson-Hicks. “Through the Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards, we aim to widen understanding and engagement of a sustainable world—and wildlife conservation specifically—for the preservation of biodiversity and the health and enrichment of everyone on Earth.”